What is Reasonable About God?

Lenten Sermon Series: God in the 21st Century
February/March 00, 2002
© The Reverend Doctor Brent A. Smith

Readings: Luke 15, The Parable of the Prodigal Son

Once there was this man who had two sons. The younger of them said to his father, "Father, give me the share of the property that’s coming to me." So he divided his resources between them.

Not too many days later, the younger son got all his things together and left home for a faraway country, where he squandered his property by living extravagantly. Just when he had spent it all, a serious famine swept through that country, and he began to do without. So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him out to his farm to feed the pigs. He longed to satisfy his hunger with the carob pods, which the pigs usually ate; but no one offered him anything. Coming to his senses he said, "Lots of my father’s hired hands have more than enough to eat, while here I am dying of starvation! I’ll get up and go to my father and I’ll say to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and affronted you; I don’t deserve to be called a son of yours any longer; treat me like one of your hired hands.’" And he got up and returned to his father.

But while he was still a long way off, his father caught sight of him and was moved to compassion. He went running out to him, threw his arms around his neck, and kissed him. And the son said to him, "Father, I have sinned against heaven and affronted you; I don’t deserve to be called a son of yours any longer."

But the father said to his slaves, "Quick! Bring out the finest robe and put it on him’ put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet. Fetch the fat calf and slaughter it; let’s have a feast and celebrate, because this son of mine was dead and has come back to life; he was lost and now if found." And they started celebrating.

Now his elder son was out in the field; and as he got closer to the house, he heard music and dancing. He called one of the servant-boys over and asked what was going on.

He said to him, "Your brother has come home and your father has slaughtered the fat calf, because he has him back safe and sound."

But he was angry and refused to go in. So his father came out and began to plead with him. But he answered his father, "See here, all these years I have slaved for you. I never once disobeyed any of your orders; yet you never once provided me with a kid goat so I could celebrate with my friends. But when this son of yours shows up, the one who has squandered your estate with prostitutes – for him you slaughter the fat calf."
But the father said him, "My child, you are always at my side. Everything that’s mine is yours. But we just had to celebrate and rejoice, because this brother of yours was dead, and has come back to life; he was lost, and now is found."

"I Call That Mind Free," responsive reading by William Ellery Channing

I call that mind free which masters the senses, and which recognizes its own reality and greatness; which passes life, not in asking what it shall eat or drink, but in hungering, thirsting, and seeking after righteousness. I call that mind free which jealously guards its intellectual rights and powers; which does not content itself with a passive or hereditary faith and opens itself to light whencesoever it may come. I call that mind free which is not passively framed by outward circumstance; which discovers everywhere the radiant signatures of the Infinite Spirit. I call that mind free which does not cower to human opinion and guards its empire over itself as nobler than the empire of the world. I call that mind free which does not mechanically copy the past, but which listens for new and higher monitions of conscience. I call that mind free which sets no bounds to its love; which recognizes in all human beings the image of God and the rights of his children. I call that mind free which no menace or peril can enthrall; which is calm in the midst of tumults, and possesses itself though all else be lost.

 

PRAYER

Oh God, thank you for this good life. And forgive us when we do not love it enough. And strengthen us for the days ahead. Fortify our will, so that when conscience speaks we act. Invigorate our moral sensibilities, so when we face good and evil we have the courage to choose and the perseverance to see our choices through. Soften our hearts to the needs of those around us, that we may love them as we ourselves would be loved. And steer us to where we are needed, especially to those needs we wouldn’t otherwise see. Thank you for this good life, and what makes us free. AMEN

 

SERMON

I have so appreciated up to now the journey we have taken together as we have tried as best we could to understand the troubling and marvelous times in which we live and the ways in which we might engage those days deeper and more meaningfully. It is a sign that we are building a spiritual community that we have undertaken hard and profound tasks together, in conversations during the week and conversations on Sunday morning. This Lenten series is an extended conversation about the ways we can conceive of the ultimate power and spirit that moves amongst human beings to form authentic community, how to conceive of that spirit in ways appropriate to the 21st century. It is an awesome, exciting, thought-provoking journey, which hopefully engages us at our most vulnerable and, thus, most receptive levels of understanding.


But, this morning we will start talking about reason and God, and there is no better place to start than with humor. This article, taken from the January 30th issue of The Onion, a newspaper that is to written news what The Daily Show is to TV news. The article is entitled, "Judge Orders God to Break Up into Smaller Deities," and includes this excerpt:

Calling the theological giant's stranglehold on the religion industry "blatantly anti-competitive," a U.S. district judge ruled Monday that God is in violation of anti-monopoly laws and ordered Him to be broken up into several less powerful deities.

"God has willfully and actively thwarted competition from other deities and demigods, promoting His worship with such unfair scare tactics as threatening non-believers with eternal damnation," wrote District Judge Charles Elliot Schofield in his decision.

"God clearly commands that there shall be no other gods before Him, and He frequently employs the phrase 'I AM the Lord' to intimidate potential deserters," prosecuting attorney Geoffrey Albert said. "God uses other questionable strongarm tactics to secure and maintain humanity's devotion, demanding, among other things, that people sanctify their firstborn to Him and obtain circumcisions as a show of faith. There have also been documented examples of Him smiting those caught worshipping graven images."

Attorneys for God did not deny such charges. They did, however, note that God offers followers "unbeatable incentives" in return for their loyalty, including eternal salvation, protection from harm, and "fruitfulness."

Leading theologians are applauding the God breakup, saying that it will usher in a new era of greater worshipping options, increased efficiency, and more personalized service.

"God's prayer-response system has been plagued by massive, chronic backlogs, and many prayers have gone unanswered in the process," said Gene Suozzi, a Phoenix-area Wiccan. "With polytheism, you pray to the deity specifically devoted to your concern. If you wish to have children, you pray to the fertility goddess. If you want to do well on an exam, you pray to the god of wisdom, and so on. This decentralization will result in more individualized service and swifter response times."

One deity who is welcoming the verdict is the ancient Greek god Zeus, who described himself as "jubilant" and "absolutely vindicated."

"For thousands of years, I've been screaming that this third-rate sky deity ripped me off wholesale," said Zeus, speaking from his Mt. Olympus residence. "Every good idea He ever had He took from me: Who first created men in his own image? Who punished mankind for its sins? Who lived eternally up in the clouds? And the whole fearsome, patriarchal, white-beard, thunderbolt thing? I was doing that eons before this two-bit hustler started horning in on the action…"

"This decision is a crushing blow to God worshippers everywhere, and we refuse to submit to a breakup until every possible avenue of argument is pursued," lead defense attorney Childers said. "I have every confidence that God will ultimately win, as He and His lawyers are all-powerful."

The other night I heard a rumbling mid winter thunderstorm move through our area, the sound of the gods bowling, my mother told me when I was a toddler, leaving the air and ground with the smell of newness and re-creation and rebirth. Had I lived a thousand years before, in medieval Europe, that thunderstorm would have sounded considerably different. It is hard for us to understand how people in different cultures and times grasped and made sense of their reality, but it surely was a different reality from our own. In medieval Europe commoners wore no wristwatches so church bells tolled the time of the day. The morning milking of the cows would begin and end with the ringing of church bells. The plowing of the fields would begin and end with the ringing of church bells. Sewing and cleaning and meal preparation, all household chores would begin and end with the ringing of church bells. And during thunderstorms the church bells were rung feverishly because it was thought that God threw lightening bolts to the earth as punishment for sins, and the ringing of church bells might mollify God such that his anger would pass by the local populace. Church bells were cast with a Latin inscription: "I summon the living, I mourn the dead, I praise God, I shatter the lightening." It wasn’t until Benjamin Franklin discovered the cause of lightning and invented the lightening rod, during what was called the Age of Reason, that its threat to human existence was abated.

It is inconceivable to us to think that ringing church bells would keep lightening from striking, yet if any of us lived in medieval Europe that is how we would grasp and shape reality towards a meaningful life. It is a simple marvel that the human mind is capable of taking in all the data, sensory experience, sort through it, think on it, critique it, hypothesize and test it, and come out the other side with some understanding of how existence is organized. And it is an equal marvel that existence is receptive to being shaped by our conceptions of it. So people can ring church bells utterly convinced it will protect them from the threat of lightening. And then later, people can put metal rods upon the tallest buildings and ground them, utterly convinced this will protect them from the threat of lightening. We grasp reality and shape it by the conceptions we have about how it works.
Theologian Paul Tillich called this, ontological reason, "the structure of the mind which enables the mind to grasp and to transform reality. It is effective in the cognitive, aesthetic, practical, and technical functions of the human mind." (Systematic Theology, I, 72) It is a simple observation with profound implications. There is a similarity between how existence and the human mind are structured. So, long ago, copper was taken, moulded into bells, with inscriptions on them, and these objects made a sound that was used to mark the beginning and end of life, and even to order the day. And they were rung mistakenly to ward off lightening. But all of that is grasping and transforming reality using cognitive, aesthetic, practical, and technical functions of the human mind. Ontological reason.

And there are different, even competing conceptions of reality that the human mind can construct in exercising this capacity for ontological reason. Those who think ringing bells mollifies God and lightening, and those who don’t. Years ago a twelve year-old boy in one of my churches unexpectedly and tragically drown. This wonderful boy was fishing a small stream when a flash flood overtook him and pulled him under. His mother attended our church, as he did every other Sunday. On the other Sunday he went with his father to a Missouri Synod Lutheran Church, taking a catechism class that taught his mother was going to hell, as was he when he attended our church. The memorial service was at our church, and the family asked that the minister of the Lutheran Church be allowed to speak also. I consented, and gave him the early part of the service because I suspected what he would say.

And he said it. This was an act of punishment God brought upon the boy for the boy’s sin. The wages of sin are death, even to a twelve year-old. It was God’s will that death be meted out for human rebellion against that will. Or, if we had been in medieval Bavaria, it could be said that the bells were rung but the sin was too great. God was not mollified and lightening came down. Here was a man, standing in a long tradition of grasping and transforming reality using cognitive, aesthetic, practical, and technical functions of the human mind. God was absolute, had formed existence in this way, the human mind to fit into the world so created, and this was a predictable result. And this was a reasonable and complete explanation that accounted for everything.

Except that it is wrong.

That is what I said when I got into the pulpit. That is not the conception of reality that we hold here. Even in the midst of the enormous differences we have, we agree we do not hold that conception, but hold a different and competing one instead. The human mind has this capacity to take the ingredients of existence, grasp them and transform them into something new. From raw materials a bell is made, rung when births and deaths occur and to order the day, and something new appears in existence that wasn’t there before. Just like when the lightening rod was invented and something new again appeared. Thus, we are affected by the events of life and we affect the events of life. A sympathetic relationship, which, if God created this order, a sympathetic relationship that God must be involved with, too. A sympathetic relationship; a relationship where two entities exist independent and dependent upon one another, for they are in a covenant, they are in a relationship, and they are both affected by the actions and the occurrences that happen to the other. So, a boy tragically drowns. In one conception of existence, God caused it. But in another the only role that could be called a God’s role would be somehow to show an infinite capacity for compassion. The boy’s mother and father and so many of us wept. We felt deep, unfathomable sorrow at the occurrence. We want a God to be responsible for all the events that occur in existence, but we know that is simply not true. We made the bell, but we had no more control over the lightening than did God. Likewise, the stream had trickled for eons, changed only by torrential downpours; which it did again, and this time a boy was swept along with the accumulations of thousands of years of nature’s way. And we wept. And God wept, too, for there is a sympathy in this existence for the deep pains that living entails. This is a different conception of the world than the one the Lutheran minister lives in, reasonable though his world may be. For this is another reasonable conception that begins not with God’s absolute power, but with human experience.

Mostly we think of reason as what theologians call technical reason or reasoning, the ability of the mind to infer, deduce, make hypotheses and test their validity. But that is just one capacity of the mind, and we think too little of human beings when we restrict reason to this narrow view. For music has a reasonable structure to it, and elicits emotions that paint a world we understand and live in. How many couples have a song that elicits sentiments from them that create a world where their love makes sense? And there is a practical, pragmatic dimension that reasoning doesn’t include, like when the first wheel was sculpted from rock and suddenly practical tasks were literally transformed. Scientists and inventors freely admit that many discoveries are less the product of calculation, and more the providence of practical luck!

All of this is to say that all human beings conceive of the world through human eyes, although we desperately yearn to know existence and life from a God’s eye view of things. This yearning to know from a God’s eye view has led humanity to ring bells to mollify what God must be thinking, and consign 12 year old boys to an early grave as just desserts. As William Ellery Channing noted this yearning can lead human beings to a reasonable conception of the world with a gallows at its center. Likewise, the distortions this yearning has yielded has led others to shrink humanity’s capacity to conceive of its world, until that capacity is no more than the technical use of the mind, in inferring, deducing, hypothesizing, and concluding, which the philosopher Pascal dismissed in his sentence about "the reasons of the heart which reason cannot comprehend." (Pencees, Selection 277) What will invigorate the 21st century is a conception of God which adds to our capacity to grasp and transform existence; which adds to it by opening up dimensions of that existence that are previously closed to our sense of things. We weep at tragedy and this right, and whatever forms the center of existence weeps, too. It is no gallows, but at the center is a heart. What will invigorate the 21st century is a conception of God that begins with our experience of our lives, and then asks what more could there be? What more of compassion? What more of justice? What more of sympathy? What more of love?

The Parable of the Prodigal Son is an old story, so old that is hard for us to hear it as an invitation to be transformed! William James called religion the prospect that there is an "unseen order" that exists in the existence we grasp and transform, but is unseen and opened up to us only at significant, revelatory, profound moments. The unseen order Jesus and others have spoken about is as real and reasonable as any others may have about how the world really is. But this order is structured not on vengeance but on love. Its center is not a gallows, but a heart. Hear then, again, this story, of a child and a parent and the expansive love that forms the center of our being and our existence.

Imagine that when you left home, it was abruptly, asking your mother and father for all that they would give you and taking that, you left. It may have been good for you to leave, or not. But leave you did, with all that you and they felt you deserved. But, life didn’t turn out as you had hoped, and all that you had, you lost, squandered away even that which you thought you had invested wisely. Destitute and utterly without any means to support yourself, you decide to return, thinking that at least you can work at home and survive, even if it means suffering the ridicule and constant reminder of your defeat and your failure. All the way home you practice your apology and practice, too, not resenting having to return. You imagine the reception you conceive you deserve. But the moment one of your parents spies you, they call the other, and both come running towards you with tears of sympathy and compassion and gratitude flowing down their face. This is what is the heart at the center of all existence. This is the reason of our days. This is the life we are called to live towards. And this is the reality that our living into, will find multiplied, until this force, this power, this spirit washes down upon all creatures of the earth. Bathing all like a rainstorm, with thunder and lightening. But creating all things new. AMEN.