|
| |
Homecoming Sunday 2008
“A Spiritual Home”
Sermon Delivered at All Souls Community Church
Grand Rapids, Michigan September 7, 2008
Copyright © 2008
The Reverend Doctor Brent A. Smith
READING
"[O]ur doctrine of [human nature], as I understand it, states that each of us is
born with potential, a potential that will be developed for good or for ill. . .
. Our will is free; we can and do make our own choices; what education can do
for us is to help us in the making of wiser choices. It is, indeed the triumph
of the Arminian Heresy, and to me one of the most exciting aspects of our faith…
We need to regain our vision of the power of all-conquering love and apply it to
the social problems of today as well as to the acts of our individual living. .
. . Choose this day life, and the salvation of all [persons] through the power
of men [and women] of goodwill and sacrificial spirit to overcome all evil."
-A 1972 Address by Rev. Dorothy Spoerl
SERMON
She clicks the heels of her ruby slippers and repeats like a mantra, “There’s no
place like home.” It is high school age Judy Garland in the 1939 movie classic,
“The Wizard of Oz,” filmed while Nazi Germany threatened Europe and the world
with war, Tolkien was composing a completely opposite view of human existence in
the dark and ominous, Lord of the Rings, and Unitarians Rev. Waitstill and
Martha Sharp traveled to Czechoslovakia to help refugees escape persecution. It
is also the last year of the existence of All Souls Universalist Church in Grand
Rapids, and it is a twist of fate that the liturgy Rev. Sharp developed would be
heard over 60 years later when All Souls Community Church first gathered and
brought Unitarian Universalist back to this city. Sharp’s liturgy is still used
today by All Souls!
History has both a public and a personal dimension, and personally I grew up in
the 1950’s and ‘60’s watching The Wizard of Oz as it became a Christmas holiday
tradition along with It’s a Wonderful Life. Like what film critic Roger Ebert
confessed, until I saw the movie it did not occur to me either that all films
were in black and white. Dorothy begins in flat and dustbowl, black and white
Kansas, and after a tornado lifts her over the rainbow, she opens the door of
her transplanted farm house and the colorful and bountiful world of Oz sits
before her. It is an utterly new and diverse and hitherto unseen world.
“It seems religious and important in a way most movies don’t,” commented Ebert,
and its mytho-poetic quality is verified in odd ways. Sixty-one year old
novelist Salman Rushdie saw it at age 10 in Bombay, India, and the narrative’s
transcendent quality, “made a writer of me,” he said. And half a world away Port
Huron native Terry McMillan, author of How Stella Got Her Groove Back, was
equally moved by the journey to the Emerald City, chuckling at the screenplay’s
irrational absurdity: “The land of Oz wasn’t such a bad place to be stuck in. It
beats the farm in Kansas.” What kind of home could Dorothy click her heels to
depart to? What could now contain the Dorothy who had traveled all the way from
Kansas through Oz to an Emerald City, banished tyranny and oppression, summoned
her emotional and intellectual energies to help liberate a small company from
their peculiar deficiencies, and discovered who she was as a human being? What
kind of home could be hers after that kind of change?
While black and white, dustbowl Kansas hadn’t changed upon Dorothy’s return, so
much of it and the world has ever since. Now Tolkkien’s foreboding vision is up
on IMAX screens along with this summer’s bleak parable of living in terrorized
times, Batman: The Dark Knight. The Wizard of Oz seems quaint and can be viewed
so many times on so many different TV channels, or downloaded to be seen at your
convenience. Yet, its mythic elements transcend time and culture, consumer
preferences and individual cravings, and can be understood by boys in Bombay and
girls in Port Huron in the 20th century, and men and women in Grand Rapids in
the 21st.
Of course there are the materialists who deny mythic elements to any story as
well as spiritual layers to human existence. A TV listing in Marin, California a
few years back illustrates this with the flat dust of 20th century Kansas:
“Transported to a surreal landscape a young girl kills the first woman she
meets, then teams up with three complete strangers to kill again.” To the
cynical eye Oz is no country for young women.
But spirituality, and seeing and understanding more to human existence than the
flat dust of a 20th century Kansas farm, requires the exercise of the human
imagination, that brilliantly created part of us where the reason of the head
merges with the sentiment of the heart to create larger sight and wider view.
The human voice, whether Garland’s or a choir’s, can liberate the spirit to
higher sentiments and loftier reasons to the heart. We can learn how to see
hopeful things in a weary world when our eyes are trained by the free and
creative mind. And human diversity and difference masks a unity of the spirit,
of scarecrows and tin men and lions as amongst men and women.
There are deeper, unseen truths that hold in the Land of Oz as surely as in our
world, although horses changing colors and supernatural flying do not. There are
facets to human nature that lie buried within us, kept hidden by our own
ignorance of who we are and the Divine image in which we have been created. The
bonds of affection in community can enliven an individual as the self cannot be
when alone. And humanity is always susceptible to creating wizards of imagined
salvation, giving weight and influence and power away to others to fulfill us,
thereby creating authoritarian oppression in the name of beneficence. We imagine
some magical individual exists to save us. But even with this inclination, the
slightest creature’s dissent exposes the tyrannical propensities beneath it,
like a small dog pulling a curtain aside to reveal that wizards are mortal men.
* * *
There are no palace guards or talking and flying monkeys in a Kansas farm family
anymore than there is in mine. The bonds of family are first produced by
romantic attraction, and the children that are its fruit are born of two
entities conjoined. The love of family can give stability and strength of
identity when family is at its best. But even in the best of families deep parts
of the self are left buried and hidden. It’s inevitable. Even family stability
and longevity yields a kind of rigidity because parents will always be parents,
and their children, children. I remember having a discussion in the living room
of a parishioner, a mother and her child, and the conversation recalled
conversations between my mother and my sister when we were growing up; except
that the parishioner was 102 years old and her daughter 74! Parts of a “child”
remain frozen and latent and unrecognized, and in some instances even disvalued
and dismissed. “Stay close to the farm,” stability cautions, “because the world
is frightening and will bruise the eager mind and soft, vulnerable heart.” The
bonds of family affection and family values in the best of circumstance are
meant foremost for survival. But in truth, they are roots from which the
branches of affection are be extended to others of different lineage, of
different composition and circumstance, along the road of our lives. It is a
demand that was long ago said more directly and better: “Love God and neighbor
as yourself,” a larger affection than what blood-family values. A spiritual home
is more than a family’s home.
There are no scarecrows seeking wisdom, nor tin men seeking affection, nor lions
struggling against cowardice in Kansas towns anymore than in Grand Rapids. But
without bonds established amongst those seeking knowledge, love, the courage to
be hopeful about human existence, what awakens and enlivens human individuality
will remain muted. There is a spirit created by human fellowship beneath the
creeds and political partisanship that we have allowed to divide the human
community. And all of us have been stunted by the divisiveness born of a
fraternal affection that we extend only to people like ourselves. There is a
part of human being that loves itself and thereby gathers friends about it like
unto itself. This is a deep and abiding good. Fraternal affection builds a
network of mutuality, a neighborhood of sameness, of those who look like us,
think like us, believe like us. But, fraternal fellowship favors affections
extended towards some, over being a means for the affection deserved by all.
There are capacities within the broadness of human connection that are only
discovered when we step into a larger fellowship, not of sameness but diversity
of thought; not of narrowness of orientation but wideness of mercy; not of fear
that cowers people together against the world, but of faith and trust in human
agency and the providence seen in Love. “Charity,” wrote one cultural observer,
“requires… a care for other human beings whether or not those human beings
reciprocate that care or provide some personal gratification.” (Bonds of
Affection, Matthew S. Holland) Or, more directly stated thousands of years
before, and which could become the mission of the odd community heading down the
yellow brick road: “What doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to
love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?” (Micah 6:8) And not end with what
your circle of friends and your neighborhood of friends give to you for your
personal satisfaction and your emotional safety. In this world as in Oz
strangers can become saints to one another. A spiritual home is larger than a
neighborhood in Kansas.
And there are no supernatural wizards here or in Oz either. What does exist in
both lands is the human inclination to give others the authority that belongs to
the self. Most religions and all political parties bind human beings together in
a unity of belief, in religion by theology and in politics by partisan position.
It is easy for each to extract loyalty at the cost of the sacredness of your own
mind and the holiness of your own consent. Too easily each can prize orthodoxy
over individuality, and in the name of what is good for humanity become
authoritarian and tyrannous over the hearts and minds of individuals. And we are
so susceptible to this tendency in our social arrangements because there is
something inside us that needs the prospect that a magical wizard in a far-off
city holds the key human destiny and the final destination of us all. There is a
basic fear abiding in human being that seeks someone to defer to, to be accepted
by, to give us an absolute truth we are incapable of experiencing in our finite
and limited human ways. The roots of oppression are in our own longings to know
rightly, love properly, and be courageous unfailingly, and we will defer to
another whom we are certain possesses these which we cannot. The true home for
the human spirit is more than a religion holding a particular creed as the only
truth, or a political party that ridicules competing views. The true home for
the spirit is not in far off Oz or in Kansas of the past, but in the nearness of
this world today and making of tomorrow “for all its calamity, to be an
hospitable home for the human spirit.” (William James) The true home for the
spirit, like the kingdom of God, is inside of you and at hand.
At the end of her quest Dorothy has become every girl, every boy, every woman
and every man, the longing and hope that makes the human spirit what it is.
“What am I? and What is? asks the human spirit with a curiosity new-kindled, but
never to be quenched,” wrote 19th century Unitarian Ralph Waldo Emerson. But
what kind of home is she fitted for now?
It’s here that the movie sounds its only false note, though the book strikes the
true chord. The writer of the movie’s screenplay ties Dorothy’s return to flat
and dustbowl, black and white Kansas, to the human longing to go back, the human
spirit’s nostalgic tie to yesterday over seeing hope in tomorrow. “There’s no
place like home,” she chants through Oz is a pretty good place to be and larger
and wider, with more opportunities for spiritual growth than her home. But in
the book, authored by Frank Baum at the beginning of the 20th century, Dorothy
is whisked back by silver slippers not because there is no place like home, but
out of her love – her affection and concern - for Auntie Em and Uncle Henry. It
is not nostalgia that calls her home. It is Love. She has found a new home in
the promise of tomorrow and a new day, as one of our Unitarian forbears wrote:
The bonds of love keep open the gates of freedom. (Napoleon Lovely) And Baum’s
Wizard of Oz is just one book in a whole series of adventures of Dorothy in Oz,
like Harry Potter in our day. And in a subsequent book she takes Auntie Em and
Uncle Henry to live with her to Oz, to depart Kansas by another way.
Spiritual homes are different than homes created by families, or those created
by fraternal fellowship like neighborhoods. Spiritual homes are created
differently than holding as dear people who believe like you, look like you, or
love like you, hold the same theology and creed and political affiliation, for
those are only fellowships of your own projections. Spiritual homes are not the
product of politics or religion when they hold commonality of belief as more
dear than broadening the bonds of human affection. Spiritual homes require a
different effort by those who seek them; a different way of seeing and being,
and trusting and hoping. Spiritual homes require a devotion to the freedom of
the mind for all, an affection this life holds for all, and a freedom and
justice that is the heritage of all. In spiritual homes persons find their
intellectual capabilities to be more than they thought, formed as they
previously were by the opinions and beliefs of others. In spiritual homes
persons, when they find their personal affections to be too narrow and safe,
seek to have their hearts broadened, even though it will mean bearing the pain
of the sufferings of others; for when our heart breaks because of the connection
we have established with others, Love become more redemptive too. In spiritual
homes men and women find the courage to see beyond fear to trust and hope for
this world. There is a truth that abides in Oz as it does in our world, but it
requires persons like Dorothy, dedicated to its demonstration and its real
embodiment: There abides a unity and freedom of the spirit expressed through a
love for all souls. Welcome home.
Amen.
| |
|